Learning Goal: I’m working on a public health discussion question and need a ref

Learning Goal: I’m working on a public health discussion question and need a reference to help me learn.Question:Define the following terms in your own words with references:
Pathophysiology and Disease
Mutation and Alleles
Dominant inheritance &Recessive inheritance
Post your original response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
Respond to at least 2 of your classmates by Sunday 19/9/2021 at 11:59 pm
Guidelines for Posting to Discussion Boards Treat your discussion board post as any other written paper or response. You will want to establish a process that works for you and use that process to produce engaging ideas that contribute to the online conversation you are having with your classmates and your professor. You shouldn’t just strive for completion, but also discussion and engagement. Before you begin: Read your prompt or discussion question carefully— pay attention to word count, citation requirements, and specific guidelines such as due dates and response requirements. Are you just answering one question or do you have to answer a question and then respond to others?
Set an agenda— making a schedule will help you stay on task and not get behind, especially with two-part due dates and follow up responses.
Narrow down what exactly you should be accomplishing in your post.
Drafting the post: Before you begin take a few minutes to observe your peer’s posts. This will allow you to see what other people are saying and allow you to even quote some of your peers.
Begin by drafting your post in MS Word or another application.
Use titles or headings to lead the reader through your post.
Use a warm opening. Don’t be too abrupt or forward right off the bat. Allow your reader time to get “into” your post without feeling lost or overwhelmed.
Avoid jokes. Because you are not in a face-to-face environment, it’s easier for someone to take something you say the wrong way.
Consider your audience. Your post will be read by your professor and your peers, so be sure to maintain a professional tone.
Responding to a post: Address your classmates by their names when responding to their posts.
Don’t dominate the conversation. Ask questions and point out specific details that you found interesting about the other posts.
Keep in mind that your goal in responding is rooted in keeping the conversation going.
Quote or restate a few ideas from the post you are responding to.
Be respectful and non-confrontational.
Be as specific as possible to encourage discussion.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Learning Goal: I’m working on a public health discussion question and need a ref

Learning Goal: I’m working on a public health discussion question and need a reference to help me learn.Question:Define the following terms in your own words with references:
Pathophysiology and Disease
Mutation and Alleles
Dominant inheritance &Recessive inheritance
Post your original response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
Respond to at least 2 of your classmates by Sunday 19/9/2021 at 11:59 pm
Guidelines for Posting to Discussion Boards Treat your discussion board post as any other written paper or response. You will want to establish a process that works for you and use that process to produce engaging ideas that contribute to the online conversation you are having with your classmates and your professor. You shouldn’t just strive for completion, but also discussion and engagement. Before you begin: Read your prompt or discussion question carefully— pay attention to word count, citation requirements, and specific guidelines such as due dates and response requirements. Are you just answering one question or do you have to answer a question and then respond to others?
Set an agenda— making a schedule will help you stay on task and not get behind, especially with two-part due dates and follow up responses.
Narrow down what exactly you should be accomplishing in your post.
Drafting the post: Before you begin take a few minutes to observe your peer’s posts. This will allow you to see what other people are saying and allow you to even quote some of your peers.
Begin by drafting your post in MS Word or another application.
Use titles or headings to lead the reader through your post.
Use a warm opening. Don’t be too abrupt or forward right off the bat. Allow your reader time to get “into” your post without feeling lost or overwhelmed.
Avoid jokes. Because you are not in a face-to-face environment, it’s easier for someone to take something you say the wrong way.
Consider your audience. Your post will be read by your professor and your peers, so be sure to maintain a professional tone.
Responding to a post: Address your classmates by their names when responding to their posts.
Don’t dominate the conversation. Ask questions and point out specific details that you found interesting about the other posts.
Keep in mind that your goal in responding is rooted in keeping the conversation going.
Quote or restate a few ideas from the post you are responding to.
Be respectful and non-confrontational.
Be as specific as possible to encourage discussion.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Find the attached document that lists examples of several major cohort studies:

Find the attached document that lists examples of several major cohort studies: choose one and use the below questions 1 -5 to write/discuss on it.
Table 7–5 in Chapter 7 of your text lists examples of several major cohort studies. Choose one of the studies (excluding the Framingham Heart Study and Nurses’ Health Study) from the list.
1. Using the data from that study, describe the public health problem in terms of magnitude, person, time and place.
2. Discuss the basic epidemiology measures used in the study. Specifically what measure of risk was used?
3. How was risk calculated? (Hint: Consider a 2 by 2 table to display the data).
4. Do you agree with the authors’ conclusions?
5. What would you infer from the data? Why?
Note: Reference style should be AMA.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Graded Discussion: Population Dynamics For this discussion, you will generate an

Graded Discussion: Population Dynamics
For this discussion, you will generate and compare population pyramids between countries and/or over time. To begin, visit https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/country?YR_ANIM=2021 (Links to an external site.) and follow the instructions below:
Select years and countries on the left side of the screen:
To view temporal changes for a single population, choose 1 country and then hold ‘Ctrl’ to select multiple years. For example, 1950, 1955, 1960, …, 2015, 2020, 2025
To view differences between 2 different populations, choose 1 year and then hold ‘Ctrl’ to select multiple countries. For example, Afghanistan and the US
Click Submit
If you selected multiple years for 1 country, you can click the ‘play’ symbol near the top of results to view an animation of the pyramid over time!
( I HAVE ALREADY SELECTED A COUNTRY AND YEAR WHICH I HAD ADD RIGHT HERE ON THIS LINK-
https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/pop?YR_ANIM=2021&COUNTRY_YR_ANIM=2021&menu=popViz&quickReports=POPGR&FIPS_SINGLE=GH&COUNTRY_YEAR=2021&FIPS=GH&popPages=PYRAMID&POP_YEARS=1993,2020&TABLE_YEARS=1993,2016,2020,2021&TABLE_USE_RANGE=N&TABLE_USE_YEARS=Y&TABLE_STEP=1&TABLE_ADD_YEARS=2021,2020,1993,2016
Discussion Requirements:
Copy/Paste the URL from your pyramid results.
Describe the results you have generated. For example, how a population changed over time, or key differences across multiple countries.
Suggest some explanations for observed changes over time or between countries
Finally, what do you think the morbidity/mortality profile might look like for the country or countries you selected?
Grading Requirements:
Everyone must create 1 original post (as described above) and reply to at least 1 post from a classmate. You will not be able to see your classmates’ posts until you post your own.
Your grade will be assessed on the following 3-point scale:
Provocative (3/3) – Response meets stated requirements and also attempts to stimulate further thought and discussion, is relevant to epidemiology and concepts learned in class, and is respectful of others’ posts
Substantial (2/3) – Response meets stated requirements but does not stimulate further analysis/discussion of the subject or is less relevant to epidemiology and concepts learned in class
Superficial (1/3) – Response does not meet all stated requirements, provides obvious information without further analysis of the concept, lacks depth of knowledge or reasoning, or has very little relevance to epidemiology and concepts learned in class
None (0/3) – Response is not complete or is not respectful of others’ posts
You are encouraged to save your initial post as a Word document, as a back-up in case of a Canvas error.
( I HAVE LISTED A LINK THAT GIVES AN IDEA ON HOW TO DISCUSS THE PYRAMINDS –
https://www.intelligenteconomist.com/demographic-transition-model/

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

AS Description: Depending on the cause of death, racial/ethnic and gender dispar

AS Description: Depending on the cause of death, racial/ethnic and gender disparities exist on years of potential life lost in the United States. Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) can be defined as the number of years lost when death occurs before one’s life expectancy. For this assignment, life expectancy will be set for everyone at 75. For YPLL, a death of a very young person is weighted more than a death of a very old person (McKenzie, Pinger, & Seabert, 2018).
AS Instructions: Investigate one cause of death (infant mortality, homicide, suicide, unintentional injuries (such as car accidents, drowning, falling, etc.), pregnancy complications, COVID-19, etc.) in the United States and research the YPLL for racial/ethnic groups and genders. Summarize your findings in your paper and discuss how calculating YPLL can change the way we think about that particular cause of death differently.
Provide factual documentation that reinforces your findings from at least three peer reviewed sources and include the citations in your narrative (where appropriate) and in your reference section using APA format. Upload your assignment as a Word document, 500 words, double-spaced, APA format.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

• Summarize the case study’s major points, focusing on 3 key aspects. • Your pre

• Summarize the case study’s major points, focusing on 3 key aspects.
• Your presentation must include the following: health condition, global importance of the health condition, intervention or program, cost-effectiveness, and impact.
• Describe at least 2 ways these public health and organizational challenges were overcome.
• Indicate how successful principles from this case study may be applied to other health problems.
• Evaluate adequacy of cost and cost-effectiveness
• Use 1 peer-reviewed article in addition to the case study to support your opinions
• Present the case study for 25 – 30 minutes using the “voice narration” function in Power Point. It should include 15 to 20 PowerPoint slides. At least 3 to 4 should provide a visual representation of information
• Information provided on the slides should be cited using AMA format with footnotes
• The final slide should contain a reference list using AMA format
• The PowerPoint presentations should be submitted through the submission link in the course.
Ersel M. Water and Sanitation Standards in Humanitarian Action. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;15(Suppl 1):27-33. Published 2016 Mar 9. doi:10.5505/1304.7361.2015.48753

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

HEALTH POLICY ANALYSIS– Part 2 Students will select a bill (part 1) that has bee

HEALTH POLICY ANALYSIS– Part 2
Students will select a bill (part 1) that has been proposed in response to a perceived public health problem and write an APA format and style paper that is three (3) pages in length (this is for the body of the paper, i.e. this excludes the cover page, abstract, etc.). The following rubric outlines what sections to include and what content to consider for each section (use APA headers in your final paper):
1 Abstract : Provide a 150-250 word abstract as a single paragraph without paragraph indention. This is a concise summary of the key points of your analysis (not the bill or health problem). It allows readers to quickly glance at the main purpose of each section of your paper. It should contain the health problem, what is the policy chosen and what it is trying to achieve, recommendations, and conclusions. Your abstract should be a single paragraph double-spaced. This should be one of the last sections you prepare for the outline assignment as the abstract is a summary of the main points of your paper.
2 Introduction to the problem: Create a succinct overview of the public health problem to be addressed. Introduce the general scope of the bill. Here you can include some very general statistics to lay the foundation of your analysis, but limit this as you will expand on this aspect in the next section.
3 The severity of health problem : Discuss the severity of the problem; the number of people affected by the identified problem and the proposed bill. Present and discuss more detailed numbers here (look up studies and reliable reports indicating patterns related to the specific aspect of the health problem you are addressing). Discuss the research behind the health problem (for example, is there a wide range of finding regarding its severity and how to best deal with it? Are there significant gaps in the research on the health problem?) Cite all references to the literature as required.
4 Overview of the bill and stakeholders: Create an brief overview of the proposed bill in terms of its specific provisions . Do not just discuss what the promoters promise it will accomplish, and do not copy the bill text, rather present it in your own words and cite as required. Make sure to read the fine print and see exactly what the bill will do. Do not simply paraphrase or list elements of the bill here.
5 Promoters and opposing groups : Discuss who the promoters of the bill and what the promoters of the bill believe the bill will accomplish (e.g. specific health outcomes). You will look beyond the bill document and bill analysis files.
Investigate which groups registered in support of and against the bill (not those who have voted for or against the bill). Do not report on members who have voted for or against the bill. Describe which individuals and/or groups are opposed to the bill, you may group them if there are many. Delineate what are their issues with the bill. You can research special interest groups, such as professional trade associations and industry groups to see what type of lobbying efforts are being made with respect to the bill. Focus on the bill analysis files as a starting point and look for those that registering their opposition to the bill.
Suggestions: review the bill analysis files, contact the author(s) of the bill, check out local news sources (I suggest ProQuest Global Newsstream database with appropriate filters). Perform Internet searches on groups listed or mentioned in the files, websites, and articles reviewed above. You must include what steps you have taken if there are no registered opposing groups for your chosen bill as you will still have to develop this section. Suggestions: look for related bills in the current or past sessions which you can find in the bill analysis files.
7 Recommendations and final analysis : Describe your recommendations based on your research and analysis of the bill; this is not the place to state your personal opinion or beliefs. Rather focus on how to improve the health outcomes described in the bill through recommendations that focus on the policy aspect. Substantiate your position with the facts and with support from the class readings, other relevant material discussed in class, as well as outside references.
8 Conclusion : Here you will wrap up what you have been discussing in your analysis above. After moving from general to specific information in the introduction and body paragraphs, your conclusion should begin pulling back into more general information that restates the main points of the health problem and how the bill addresses this particular problem.
9 Mechanics: readability, English usage, adherence to APA style (title page, abstract, body with specific headers, etc.). The reference section needs to include at least 8 quality sources that are appropriate for the specific section (for example, you will need reputable statistical sources for the severity section). The bill and all bill analysis files do NOT count toward this requirement.
NOTE:- The bill i choose is AB-673 Domestic violence.(2021-2022)
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB673&search_keywords=violence

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

HCA 4308 Unit II Project Topic For this assignment, you will select a public hea

HCA 4308 Unit II Project Topic
For this assignment, you will select a public health research topic, and create a research question. Be sure to include an
introduction/background of the topic. The objective of this assignment is for you to prepare for your Unit VIII Course Project.
You must use scholarly, peer-reviewed material for this assignment.
You are to write a formal 500-word paper, double-spaced, with in text citations and references in APA format, to answer the
questions below:
1. What is your research topic (give information/details about the topic)?
2. Why did you choose this topic?
3. What is your research question?
4. Include background information on the selected topic.
5. Using the CSU Online library, select a minimum of three scholarly, peer-reviewed sources (journal articles).
Some example topics may include the following:
health literacy,
access to adequate health care,
employee wellness programs,
health disparities among minorities, and
smoking within the workplace.
The purpose of the Course Project is for you to design a research study. You will not actually be distributing questionnaires
or interviewing participants. This project will showyou the proper way to design a study as if you were performing specific
health-related research.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Graded Discussion: Population Dynamics For this discussion, you will generate an

Graded Discussion: Population Dynamics
For this discussion, you will generate and compare population pyramids between countries and/or over time. To begin, visit https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/country?YR_ANIM=2021 (Links to an external site.) and follow the instructions below:
Select years and countries on the left side of the screen:
To view temporal changes for a single population, choose 1 country and then hold ‘Ctrl’ to select multiple years. For example, 1950, 1955, 1960, …, 2015, 2020, 2025
To view differences between 2 different populations, choose 1 year and then hold ‘Ctrl’ to select multiple countries. For example, Afghanistan and the US
Click Submit
If you selected multiple years for 1 country, you can click the ‘play’ symbol near the top of results to view an animation of the pyramid over time!
( I HAVE ALREADY SELECTED A COUNTRY AND YEAR WHICH I HAD ADD RIGHT HERE ON THIS LINK-
https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/pop?YR_ANIM=2021&COUNTRY_YR_ANIM=2021&menu=popViz&quickReports=POPGR&FIPS_SINGLE=GH&COUNTRY_YEAR=2021&FIPS=GH&popPages=PYRAMID&POP_YEARS=1993,2020&TABLE_YEARS=1993,2016,2020,2021&TABLE_USE_RANGE=N&TABLE_USE_YEARS=Y&TABLE_STEP=1&TABLE_ADD_YEARS=2021,2020,1993,2016
Discussion Requirements:
Copy/Paste the URL from your pyramid results.
Describe the results you have generated. For example, how a population changed over time, or key differences across multiple countries.
Suggest some explanations for observed changes over time or between countries
Finally, what do you think the morbidity/mortality profile might look like for the country or countries you selected?
Grading Requirements:
Everyone must create 1 original post (as described above) and reply to at least 1 post from a classmate. You will not be able to see your classmates’ posts until you post your own.
Your grade will be assessed on the following 3-point scale:
Provocative (3/3) – Response meets stated requirements and also attempts to stimulate further thought and discussion, is relevant to epidemiology and concepts learned in class, and is respectful of others’ posts
Substantial (2/3) – Response meets stated requirements but does not stimulate further analysis/discussion of the subject or is less relevant to epidemiology and concepts learned in class
Superficial (1/3) – Response does not meet all stated requirements, provides obvious information without further analysis of the concept, lacks depth of knowledge or reasoning, or has very little relevance to epidemiology and concepts learned in class
None (0/3) – Response is not complete or is not respectful of others’ posts
You are encouraged to save your initial post as a Word document, as a back-up in case of a Canvas error.
( I HAVE LISTED A LINK THAT GIVES AN IDEA ON HOW TO DISCUSS THE PYRAMINDS –
https://www.intelligenteconomist.com/demographic-transition-model/

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Graded Discussion: Population Dynamics For this discussion, you will generate an

Graded Discussion: Population Dynamics
For this discussion, you will generate and compare population pyramids between countries and/or over time. To begin, visit https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/country?YR_ANIM=2021 (Links to an external site.) and follow the instructions below:
Select years and countries on the left side of the screen:
To view temporal changes for a single population, choose 1 country and then hold ‘Ctrl’ to select multiple years. For example, 1950, 1955, 1960, …, 2015, 2020, 2025
To view differences between 2 different populations, choose 1 year and then hold ‘Ctrl’ to select multiple countries. For example, Afghanistan and the US
Click Submit
If you selected multiple years for 1 country, you can click the ‘play’ symbol near the top of results to view an animation of the pyramid over time!
( I HAVE ALREADY SELECTED A COUNTRY AND YEAR WHICH I HAD ADD RIGHT HERE ON THIS LINK-
https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/pop?YR_ANIM=2021&COUNTRY_YR_ANIM=2021&menu=popViz&quickReports=POPGR&FIPS_SINGLE=GH&COUNTRY_YEAR=2021&FIPS=GH&popPages=PYRAMID&POP_YEARS=1993,2020&TABLE_YEARS=1993,2016,2020,2021&TABLE_USE_RANGE=N&TABLE_USE_YEARS=Y&TABLE_STEP=1&TABLE_ADD_YEARS=2021,2020,1993,2016
Discussion Requirements:
Copy/Paste the URL from your pyramid results.
Describe the results you have generated. For example, how a population changed over time, or key differences across multiple countries.
Suggest some explanations for observed changes over time or between countries
Finally, what do you think the morbidity/mortality profile might look like for the country or countries you selected?
Grading Requirements:
Everyone must create 1 original post (as described above) and reply to at least 1 post from a classmate. You will not be able to see your classmates’ posts until you post your own.
Your grade will be assessed on the following 3-point scale:
Provocative (3/3) – Response meets stated requirements and also attempts to stimulate further thought and discussion, is relevant to epidemiology and concepts learned in class, and is respectful of others’ posts
Substantial (2/3) – Response meets stated requirements but does not stimulate further analysis/discussion of the subject or is less relevant to epidemiology and concepts learned in class
Superficial (1/3) – Response does not meet all stated requirements, provides obvious information without further analysis of the concept, lacks depth of knowledge or reasoning, or has very little relevance to epidemiology and concepts learned in class
None (0/3) – Response is not complete or is not respectful of others’ posts
You are encouraged to save your initial post as a Word document, as a back-up in case of a Canvas error.
( I HAVE LISTED A LINK THAT GIVES AN IDEA ON HOW TO DISCUSS THE PYRAMINDS –
https://www.intelligenteconomist.com/demographic-transition-model/

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount