8-1 Journal: General Policy Considerations and Policy Assessment (Final Project

8-1 Journal: General Policy Considerations and Policy Assessment (Final Project Section II: H and I)
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
For this journal, you will complete sections II. H and II. I of the Final Project. You will incorporate this work when you submit your Final Project.
To complete this assignment, please refer to the following documents:
• Module Eight Journal Guidelines and Rubric PDF
• Policy Assessment Worksheet
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Module Eight Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Oops! We’re having trouble connecting you. You might want to refresh the page, or try again later.
refresh the page

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Proper Patient Care – Communication Techniques View the video as if the patient

Proper Patient Care – Communication Techniques
View the video as if the patient in the bed is a loved one, your mother, your sister, you aunt, your best friend, etc… Provide a minimum of a two paragraph response.
In the first part of the response, describe how you feel viewing the first part of the video. The nurse comes back in with a different composure. Describe how you feel about her empathetic approach.
For the second part of the response, you are the Nurse. Describe how you feel when speaking to this patient.
Instructions must have:
.Each paragraph should be more than 8 sentences.
.Include Reference, article or journal (Post your source!) for the assignment.
.Share your experiences as they relate to the topic.
. watch the video for the assignment.

Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Proper Patient Care – Communication Techniques

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Strategic Analysis II—Systems Thinking Tool (

7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Strategic Analysis II—Systems Thinking Tool (Causal Loop Diagram)
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
In this milestone, you will complete critical element G of section II—Strategic Analysis. You will create a causal loop diagram to visualize the issues and strategies related to the case study.
For additional details, please refer to the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.
A text-only version of the images used in the Milestone Three guidelines is available: Causal Loop Diagrams Text Version
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Milestone Three Rubric
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Constructing
50 points
Constructed a complex causal loop diagram exceeding the requirements—specifically in terms of the complexity of the relationships within the diagram
45 points
Constructed a complete causal loop diagram per the requirements, containing the required number of variables, linkages, arrows, and polarity signs, and at least one feedback loop
35 points
Constructed a partial causal loop diagram with not all of the components present—for instance, the requirements for feedback loops were not met
0 points
Did not construct a causal loop diagram
Score of Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Constructing, / 50
Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Quality
50 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates especially insightful understanding of the relationships
45 points
Constructs a causal loop diagram in which all relationships (linkages, polarity, loops, etc.) are logically rooted in public health and evidence-based practices
35 points
Constructs a causal loop diagram, but the relationships (linkages, polarity, loops, etc.) are not logically rooted in public health and evidence-based practices
0 points
Does not construct a causal loop diagram
Score of Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Quality, / 50
Rubric Total Score
Total
Score of Milestone Three Rubric, / 100 Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Strategic Analysis II—Systems Thinking Tool (

7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Strategic Analysis II—Systems Thinking Tool (Causal Loop Diagram)
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
In this milestone, you will complete critical element G of section II—Strategic Analysis. You will create a causal loop diagram to visualize the issues and strategies related to the case study.
For additional details, please refer to the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.
A text-only version of the images used in the Milestone Three guidelines is available: Causal Loop Diagrams Text Version
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Milestone Three Rubric
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Constructing
50 points
Constructed a complex causal loop diagram exceeding the requirements—specifically in terms of the complexity of the relationships within the diagram
45 points
Constructed a complete causal loop diagram per the requirements, containing the required number of variables, linkages, arrows, and polarity signs, and at least one feedback loop
35 points
Constructed a partial causal loop diagram with not all of the components present—for instance, the requirements for feedback loops were not met
0 points
Did not construct a causal loop diagram
Score of Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Constructing, / 50
Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Quality
50 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates especially insightful understanding of the relationships
45 points
Constructs a causal loop diagram in which all relationships (linkages, polarity, loops, etc.) are logically rooted in public health and evidence-based practices
35 points
Constructs a causal loop diagram, but the relationships (linkages, polarity, loops, etc.) are not logically rooted in public health and evidence-based practices
0 points
Does not construct a causal loop diagram
Score of Strategic Analysis: Systems Thinking Tool—Quality, / 50
Rubric Total Score
Total
Score of Milestone Three Rubric, / 100 Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

• Schedule either an online or in-person Brainstorming Session with your key sta

• Schedule either an online or in-person Brainstorming Session with your key stakeholders.
• Determine and describe a Meeting Goal and identify the Process/method you will use to generate innovative ideas from all stakeholders.
o Share this information with your stakeholders in your invitation.
• If you do not have a way to schedule meetings at your organization, try a free application, like Doodle
https://doodle.com/
or SetMore
https://www.setmore.com/.
• Research Consensus Decision-Making Methods and identify one that is appropriate for your group.
• Describe the method and why you selected this method over others.
• Create a Meeting Agenda.
o Include how your team will brainstorm and generate ideas to reach a consensus.
• Share your agenda with your stakeholders prior to meeting so expectations are provided upfront.
• Conduct your brainstorming session with key stakeholders and assign someone to record the Meeting Minutes.
o Create a list of all the ideas that were generated and note the innovative idea that was selected for consideration, as it will become the focus of your paper.
o Describe the rationale for this selection.
• Write a brief Reflection Summary of what you have done/learned thus far.
Brainstorming Session Goal and Processes:
• Write a summary of the goal of the brainstorming session and processes for generating ideas.
2b. Written descriiption of the method for consensus decision-making:
• Discuss the reason this process/method was selected.
2c. Meeting Agenda:
• Include a descriiption of how ideas will be captured and the process for seeking consensus.
2d. Meeting Minutes:
• Include a list of all ideas and the one innovative idea that will be considered for implementation.
• Meet with your key stakeholder team to discuss the plans for communication that will help diffuse the innovation within the organization.
• Create an Outline of the Communication Plan that you and your key stakeholders developed.
• Summarize a Training Plan for employees impacted by the evidence-based innovation.
o Identify appropriate strategies to ensure the most efficient training delivery method is utilized.
o Include who will provide the training and what knowledge and skills they need to conduct the training.
o Determine if different training plans for different stakeholders are needed. Consider the logistics of training, such as schedules, equipment, impact of training on other operations, additional resources required, and notifying stakeholders.
• Create an Action Plan to include a minimum of ten essential tasks that must be completed prior to implementing your innovation in the setting you selected.
• In your “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Assessment” Template, complete “Table 2. Innovation Action Plan.” Copy and paste this table into your e-portfolio.
Responsible Person (Role) Responsibilities Timeline
• Write a brief Reflection Summary
3a. Outline of the Communication Plan created with your stakeholders.
3b. Written Summary of your Training Plan.
3c. Completed Copy of Table 2. Innovation Action Plan.
• Copy and paste the table into your e-portfolio.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Purpose The Alternative Writing Assignment mirrors the discussion content of De

Purpose
The Alternative Writing Assignment mirrors the discussion content of Debriefing and will allow the student to expand their knowledge of physical health assessment principles specific to the advanced practice role.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Identify and articulate advanced assessment health history and physical examination techniques which are relevant to a focused body system (CO 1)
Differentiate normal and abnormal findings with regard to a disease or condition that impacts the body system (CO 2)
Adapt advanced assessment skills if necessary to suit the needs of specific patient populations (CO 4)
Due Date:
The alternative writing assignment is due no later than the Sunday 11:59 PM MT of the week in which the student did not attend the weekly debriefing session. For example, if you did not attend a debriefing session for Week 3, the written assignment is due the Sunday at the end of Week 4.
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
Total Points Possible: 30 Points
Requirements:
NOTE: Complete the NR 509 Alternative Writing Assignment ONLY if you did not attend or do not plan to attend Debriefing for the given week.
This paper will be appraised on the quality of the information, inclusion of at least one evidence-based scholarly source, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details below).
Scholarly sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
The length of the paper is to be no less than 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.
Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
APA format (current edition) is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1 inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation.
Organize the headings and content of your paper using the outline below:
Select a body system relevant to the lesson from the previous week for the topic of this paper. For example, if you are writing this assignment for Week 2, then select the HEENT, Respiratory, or Integumentary system as the focus for the paper (not all three systems). NOTE: If you are writing this assignment for Week 1, select the Health History as the topic of the paper.
Discuss the physiology (structure and function) of the body system including details about the major organ systems (if applicable). NOTE: If you are writing the assignment for Week 1, provide an overview of interviewing techniques.
Construct relevant health history questions (subjective data) pertaining to the body system. NOTE: If writing the assignment for Week 1, construct relevant health history questions for all body systems as included on the review of systems (ROS).
Provide an overview of the objective data and expected normal physical examination findings for this body system. NOTE: If writing this assignment for Week 1, provide the expected normal subjective findings for each body systems on the ROS.
Explain special physical assessment examination techniques or procedures specific to assessing this body system. NOTE: If writing the assignment for Week 1, explain advanced interview techniques.
Analyze and discuss how you might adapt your physical assessment skills or interviewing techniques to accommodate each of the following specific populations:
Infant/pediatric
Pregnancy
Geriatric
Identify one major disease or disease process that may significantly impact this body system. NOTE: If writing the assignment for Week 1, identify one disease process or condition that may significantly hinder conducting a Health History interview.
Synthesis and discuss the expected abnormal physical examination findings that may be associated with this disease or disease process.
Summarize the key points.
References in correct APA format
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Descriiption
Application of Knowledge, Analysis, and Clarity
10
33.33
The quality of this criterion will be evaluated based upon the following: demonstration of analysis, synthesis, and/or application of principles and concepts consistent with the principles of advanced physical assessment; relevance of content specific to the topic; expected normal findings, appropriate health history questions, and organization and clear presentation of information.
Adapted Physical Assessment Skills to Special Populations, Disease Process, Summary, and Scholarly Source
10
33.33
The quality of this criterion will be evaluated based upon the following: discussion regarding how to adapt physical assessment skills or techniques to accommodate all special populations; identification and discussion of one major disease or disease process and expected examination findings; and summation of key points. Must include at least one scholarly source to support the paper.
Total CONTENT Points= 20 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Descriiption
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics, APA Format, and Word Requirement
10
33.33
The assignment has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post. The length of the paper is not less than 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.
* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion
Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 30 points
Rubric
NR509 Weeks 1-6 Alternative Writing Assignment_Sept19 (2)
NR509 Weeks 1-6 Alternative Writing Assignment_Sept19 (2)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 20 Points
Criterion 1
Application of Knowledge, Analysis, and Clarity
Must demonstrate the following elements:
Select an appropriate topic or focus for the assignment;
Demonstrate analysis, synthesis, and/or application of principles and concepts
consistent with advanced physical assessment;
Provide appropriate health history questions;
Identify the expected normal findings;
Content is specific to the topic;
Paper is organized and clearly presented.
(6 Required Elements)
10 pts
Excellent
Demonstrates all elements of the Criterion
9 pts
V. Good
Missing 1 element of the Criterion
8 pts
Satisfactory
Missing 2 elements of the Criterion
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 3 elements of the Criterion
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Missing 4 or more elements OR No assignment
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 2 Adapted Physical Assessment Skills to Special Populations, Disease Process, Summary, and Scholarly Sources
Must demonstrate the following elements:
Discuss how to adapt physical assessment skills or techniques to accommodate all special populations;
Identify one major disease or disease process and expected examination findings;
Demonstrate appropriate knowledge of physical assessment examination techniques or procedures;
Identify abnormal findings;
Summarize key points
Must include at least one scholarly source
(6 Required Elements)
10 pts
Excellent
Demonstrates all elements of the Criterion
9 pts
V. Good
Missing 1 element of the Criterion
8 pts
Satisfactory
Missing 2 elements of the Criterion
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 3 elements of the Criterion
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Missing 4 or more elements OR No assignment
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points
Format Criterion 1
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics, APA Format, and Word Requirement
NOTE: Failure to comply with the word requirements for this assignment will result in the grade of zero (0) for this Criterion.
10 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format
9 pts
V. Good
2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format
8 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format
5 pts
Needs Improvement
6-7 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
8 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format Or Less than 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list OR No assignment
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Minus Points
0 pts
Minus Points
0 pts
Total Points: 30

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

School login: https://community.chamberlain.edu/s/login-page Login information w

School login: https://community.chamberlain.edu/s/login-page
Login information would be available for the assigned writer.
Click go to class on the left hand side.
Click courses on left hand side
Click Advanced Physical Assessment-Campbell
Click Modules
Click Week 1: Shadow Health Assessment Assignment
You will complete all assessment assignments using the Shadow Health  virtual reality simulation platform. 
Introduction and Pre-brief
In this graded assignment, you will interview Tina Jones to conduct a comprehensive health history and collect data to assess Ms. Jones’ recent right foot injury. You will have the opportunity to educate and empathize with Tina to engage in effective therapeutic communication; create a problem list using evidence from the data you collected; prioritize the identified problems to differentiate immediate from non-immediate care; and plan how to best address the most important concern with further assessment, interventions, and patient education. For this assignment, you will conduct a limited physical assessment. Your objective documentation must include a general statement and the findings for the skin (integumentary) body system.
Tips and Tricks
You will earn points on the Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) score during Shadow Health activities for how well you identify and respond to opportunities to emphasize and educate your patients. Just as in real life, timing matters. For example, if your patient reveals that she is experimenting with illegal drugs and you “skip over” the chance to address the issue during the interview, you will not be able to recapture that moment to educate your patient later in the activity. Consequently, you will lose points on the Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) score.
At the end of each Physical Assessment Assignment in Shadow Health are post-activity reflection questions. Be aware that the quality of your response to each question is measured as part of the graded assignment. Please review the details on the guideline and grading rubric. In order to achieve full credit for this portion of the grading rubric, you need to respond to each reflection post question, provide analysis of your performance, use professional language, and demonstrate insight. Please reach out to your faculty with any questions.
Purposes
The purposes of the Shadow Health Physical Assessment Assignments are to: (a) increase knowledge and understanding of advanced practice physical assessment skills and techniques, (b) conduct focused and comprehensive histories and physical assessments for various patient populations, (c) adapt or modify your physical assessment skills and techniques to suit the individual needs of the patient, (d) apply assessment skills and techniques to gather subjective and objective data, (e) differentiate normal from abnormal physical examination findings, (f) summarize, organize, and appropriately document findings using correct professional terminology, (g) practice developing primary and differential diagnoses, (h) practice creating treatment plans which include diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, and follow-up planning; and (i) analyze and reflect on own performance to gain insight and foster knowledge.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Apply knowledge and understanding of advanced practice physical assessment skills and techniques (CO1)
Perform focused and comprehensive histories and physical assessments for various patient populations (CO4 and CO5)
Adapt skills and techniques to suit the individual needs of the patient (CO4)
Differentiate normal from abnormal physical examination findings (CO2)
Summarize, organize, and document findings using correct professional terminology (CO3)
Reflect upon performance to gain insight and foster knowledge (CO1)
Due Date:
Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 1.
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
Total Points Possible: 75 Points
Assignment
Step One: Complete the Shadow Health Orientation
Step Two: Complete Conversation Lab
Step Three: Complete Health History Assignment
Step Four: Document your findings on the Fillable Soap Note Template Download Fillable Soap Note Template
Minimize File Preview
or the Printable Soap Note. Download Printable Soap Note.
Step Five: Upload the Lab Pass and completed SOAP Note as separate documents to the same assignment tab in the gradebook.
Requirements
NOTE: Before initiating any activity in Shadow Health, complete the required course weekly readings and lessons as well as review the introduction and pre-brief 
On the Shadow Health Platform:
Complete the Shadow Health Conversation Concept Lab prior to beginning the graded assignment. 
Gather subjective and objective data by completing a comprehensive health history and brief physical examination for the assessment assignment.
Critically appraise the findings as normal or abnormal.  
Based on the interview and brief physical assessment, create a problem list.
Complete the post activity assessment questions for each assignment.
Complete all reflection questions following each physical assessment assignment.
Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) scores do not round up. For example, a DCE score of 92.99 is a 92, not a 93.
You have a maximum of two (2) attempts per Shadow Health assignment to improve your performance. However, you may elect not to repeat any assignment. NOTE: If you repeat an attempt, ONLY the second attempt will be graded, regardless of the DCE score. Please refer to the grading rubric categories for details. 
Download the Lab Pass for the final attempt on the assignment (see number 8).
On the Canvas Platform:
Summarize, organize, and appropriately document findings using correct professional terminology on the SOAP Note Template.
Document a comprehensive problem list based upon the history and physical examination findings on the SOAP Note Template.
Provide rationales and citations for diagnoses and interventions for the brief treatment plan.
Include at least one scholarly source to support diagnoses and treatment interventions with rationales and references on the SOAP note. Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article.  The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.  These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.  For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. Each student is responsible for determining the scholarship and quality of any .com site.  Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years.  Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
Upload the Lab Pass to the appropriate assignment area in Canvas Grades
Shadow Health Grading Rubric
Portions of the rubric are designated with a ***. The following explains those portions of the rubric:
* Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) Score is automatically translated by Shadow Health based on individual student performance and reflects how student work compares to their peer learners across the country for a particular assignment. The DCE Score is a fair assessment of effort, and therefore is appropriate for use when grading assignments.
**Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article.  The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.  These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.  For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. Each student is responsible for determining the scholarship and quality of any .com site.  Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years.  Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
***Components of a treatment plan include diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, and follow-up planning
****Insight refers to the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a concept or thing. For example, one might demonstrate insight by relating a concept to a personal or meaningful experience.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Descriiption
Health History Communication, Education, Empathy, and Summary
(DCE Score or transcriipt)
15
20%
The Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) Score is automatically translates by Shadow Health based on individual student performance and reflects how student work with data collection, health history communication, education, empathy, and summarization compares to peer learners across the country for a particular assignment. The DCE Score is a fair assessment of effort, and therefore is appropriate for use when grading assignments. Occasionally, performance transcriipts may be reviewed for secondary support.
Assessment, Documentation, Treatment Plan, and Scholarly Sources
35
47%
This category is evaluated on the quality of student’s ability to: Identify pertinent normal and abnormal findings for the assignment, utilize professional terminology, provide comprehensive and detailed subjective and objective documentation, and identify relevant problems on the problem list. Include at least one appropriate EBP scholarly source with the SOAP note.
Self-Reflection
15
20%
Self-reflection posts must demonstrate the student’s own perspective. The quality of this criterion is based upon responding to all the reflection questions; providing responses that are substantive (add importance, meaningfulness, and relevance to the post); demonstrate analysis of own performance; and demonstrate insight. Insight refers to the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a concept or thing. For example, one might demonstrate insight by relating a concept to a personal or meaningful experience. Reflection post responses should vary from SH assignment to assignment.
65
87%
Total CONTENT Points= 65
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Descriiption
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format
10
13%
Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.
* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the assignment
10
13%
Total FORMAT Points= 10
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75 points
Rubric
NR509 Week 1 Shadow Health Assessment_Sept19
NR509 Week 1 Shadow Health Assessment_Sept19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 65 Points
Criterion 1
Health History Communication, Education, Empathy, and Summary
(DCE Score or Transcriipt)
15 pts
Excellent
DCE Score > 93
14 pts
V. Good
DCE Score > 86-92
12 pts
Satisfactory
DCE Score > 80-85
8 pts
Needs Improvement
DCE Score < 79 0 pts Unsatisfactory No Assignment 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 2 Assessment, Documentation, Treatment Plan, and Scholarly Sources Criterion 2 Assessment, Documentation, Treatment Plan, and Scholarly Sources Must demonstrate the following elements: Identify all pertinent normal and abnormal findings; Use professional terminology; Subjective and objective documentation was detailed and comprehensive; Use the SOAP Note Format template for documentation; Address each of the following on the brief treatment plan: Diagnostics, Medication, Education, Referral/Consultation, and Follow-up Planning; Interventions are detailed and appropriate for the focused assignment; Provide at least one appropriate EBP scholar source (7 Required Elements) 35 pts Excellent Identifies 12 out of 12 diagnoses on the problem list AND Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion 32 pts V. Good Identifies 10-12 out of 12 diagnoses on the problem list OR Missing 1-2 elements for the Criterion 29 pts Satisfactory Identifies 8-9 out of twelve diagnoses on the problem list OR Missing 3-4 elements for the Criterion 18 pts Needs Improvement Identifies 6-7 diagnoses on the problem list OR Missing 5 elements on for the Criterion 0 pts Unsatisfactory Identifies 5 or fewer diagnoses on the problem list OR Missing 6 or more elements for the Criterion OR No Assignment 35 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 3 Self-Reflection Must demonstrate the following elements: Written from the student’s own perspective; Responded to all the reflection questions; Responses were each substantive (added importance, meaningfulness, and relevance to the post); Offer self-analysis of performance and insight; Reflection post responses should vary from SH assignment to assignment. (5 Required Elements) 15 pts Excellent Demonstrates all elements for this Criterion 14 pts V. Good Missing 1 element for this Criterion 13 pts Satisfactory Missing 2 elements for this Criterion 9 pts Needs Improvement Missing 3 elements for this Criterion 0 pts Unsatisfactory Missing 4 or more elements for the criterion OR No Assignment 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points Format Criterion 1 Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format 10 pts Excellent 0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format 9 pts V. Good 2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format 8 pts Satisfactory 4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format 5 pts Needs Improvement 6-7 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format 0 pts Unsatisfactory 8 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, or APA format OR No assignment 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy. 0 pts Minus Points 0 pts Minus Points 0 pts Total Points: 75

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Hide Assignment Information Turnitin® Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be s

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Identify two healthcare organizations that have been listed on the most recent Fortune “best companies” and visit their website to see why they may have made the list.
100 Best Companies to Work For
What makes them a “best company”?
How does your organization compare?
For this assignment, respond to each question above in a written response of no more than four bullet points per question. Submit your response as a MS Word document.
Make sure you use 2 companies from health care. since i work in a hospital setting. my company is atlantic health system if you need to look in to it

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Please see the attached document and follow instructions step by step, I do not

Please see the attached document and follow instructions step by step, I do not need the grids filled out just the chart that describes the plan TABLE 2. and the written portion of the assignment. The attachment titled questions is what the instructions reference to, in order to help guide the writing. Please pay attention to instructions. I started writing already to give you an idea of what the paper needs to be about.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Youtube Link: https://youtu.be/dNLtAj0wy6I Video Title: Cultural Competence

Youtube Link: https://youtu.be/dNLtAj0wy6I
Video Title: Cultural Competence for Healthcare Providers
Directions:
After reviewing the Cultural competence training video with patient and provider’s perspectives and reading your textbook, Answer the following question(s):
1) Cultural competence and diversity are often considered to have the same meaning in healthcare facilities. What is the difference between these two terms and their applicability in terms of healthcare professionals in various healthcare settings?
2) Explain the unique circumstances under which the ancestors of most Black/African American people arrived in the Americas. Why is it important for health service professionals to understand this history?
3) Is Hispanic a racial or ethnic category? Explain. How might this impact the status of the African/Black group, for example, in terms of whether it is the largest or second largest minority group?
4) List the racial categories based on the OMB classification in the United States. Explain the geographic origins of the people designated for each of the categories. Why is it important for health professionals to understand cultural differences among and between groups?
5) A physical therapy office in “Little Haiti” in Miami, Florida is closed due to lack of funds. All patients’ appointments are routed to a nearby hospital’s physical therapy department in which the predominant population served is Cuban. List and describe a minimum some steps you believe the department has to take to meet the needs of the patients from a culturally competent prospective.
A minimum of three references is required to support your response to the discussion questions. Only 1 references can be in the textbook. Make sure your references are in APA format. Everything has to be in APA format.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount