Personal ethic statemnt

I am a Christian and don’t ever want to hurt anyone or lie
For your midterm exam, you will combine your summaries of the core ethical principles and ideas to create a personal ethical portfolio. You will also write a personal ethical statement. You will use these materials to analyze your media ethics cases for the rest of the semester and for the final exam.
Given the specific objectives of this course, your personal ethical statement must draw from
philosophical theories and models,
religious ideas, and
the professional code of conduct for your desired profession.
In order to receive credit for the personal ethical statement, you need to use and reference the material we have covered in class so far. Make sure you cite your sources.
You will not be graded on the specific content of the statement (i.e., if I agree with your ethics or not), but on its comprehensiveness and use of philosophical, religious, and professional ideas. If you have any concerns about these requirements, please speak with your instructor. The personal statement length should be 2-3 pages, though the portfolio will be longer since it includes all the summaries you did to the date of the midterm.
Format:
Title page with student name, class/section, date
Table of contents
Reading Summaries
Your own ripped from the headlines write up
Personal ethical statement
Sources or works cited
Here are several examples of Personal Ethical Statements. In some of them, I have deleted the readings summaries. Also, just as a note, in earlier classes sometimes the summaries were called “abstracts” and had a slightly different format. If you have any questions, please contact the instructor or TA.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Making Ethical Decisions

Thinking ethically is required in order to make an ethical decision. Ethics is not just about imagining a better situation or a better version of yourself, rather it is about acting and finding sustainable ways to make decisions. For this discussion, review (https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/) Read through the document, paying close attention to the framework offered, while also considering the section on “What is NOT ethics.” Then read through the ethical standards. While this is not an exhausted list of ethics nor is there a singular business definition of ethics, this is a starting point for applying ethics in the workplace.
Reflect on the framework and the short guide offered. Does it make sense? Are the items listed as standards accurate? How about the areas that are NOT ethics, do they make sense? Can you think of a time when you have experienced a situation that one of these content areas was considered ethics? How about a work situation that clearly articulated an ethical standard?
Use this reference.
Byars, S. M., & Stanberry, K. (2018). Business Ethics (1st ed.). OpenStax.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Debate

2 parts of writing ONLY: Debate Introduction & Conclusion.
A. Please write a debate introduction for the ethical dilemma for the uploaded case scenario document by referencing ethical theories, principles and evidence that nursing standards were considered.
B. For the Conclusion part, please conclude the writing based on the documents uploaded “Against” & “For.”

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Ethic Essay Questions

This is a theoretical case taken from VHA Intensive Ethics Advisory Committee Training, 1998, as presented by Arthur R. Derse MD, JD. An 87-year-old woman widowed for six years, who is otherwise healthy, was visiting another city and abruptly became ill. She was seen in the emergency department of the local VA and admitted to the on-call physician. The on-call physician (who has not previously seen her) made the diagnosis of bowel obstruction arid made arrangements for a surgeon to evaluate her. The surgeon recommended surgery and obtained her consent for surgery. The surgeon expects an uneventful recovery. She is told that she will be on a ventilator for a short time after surgery. The patient tells the surgeon that is OK as long as it is for a short time. She tells the surgeon that she does not want to be dependent upon machines. She was asked upon admission whether she had an advance directive. She replied that she has a living will and a power of attorney for health care which names her daughter (who does not live in the area) as her health care agent. The patient undergoes surgery, which is successful in treating the underlying problem and does not show any malignant causes, but in the recovery room she has a cardiopulmonary arrest and is resuscitated. She is transferred to the ICU in the care of the on-call physician. The physician attempts to wean her gradually from the ventilator, but this is unsuccessful. Three days later, she has regained consciousness but is still intubated. Though she cannot speak because of the ventilator, she is able to write and asks that the tube be removed. The attending physician tells her that she is dependent upon the ventilator and the patient needs to remain on the ventilator until she can breathe on her own. She writes that she understands that she may die, but she does not want to be on machines. Her only children — a daughter and son — – have arrived. She repeats her wish to them that she wants the tube removed. She writes to her daughter that “I don’t want to die, but we all have to die sometime, and I don’t want to have to live on a machine. I know that whatever the outcome, God will take care of me.” Her daughter tells the physician that her mother is adamant that she be off of machines and she respects her mother’s wishes, even if she cannot breathe on her own. She says this is consistent with her previously expressed wishes and her religious beliefs. Her son tells the physician that he disagrees with his sister — since his mother does not have a terminal condition, he can not see why she should not be forced to put up with the ventilator until she can be weaned from it. He feels that she is being shortsighted, and she will be thankful to have been kept on the ventilator when she is finally able to be weaned. Describe the criteria for giving “legal” consent. Were all elements met in this case? In other words, did the patient demonstrate decision-making capacity? Explain. (Minimum of 1 page including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)
Based on case study above: Is this patient requesting to be euthanized or for her physician to assist in her suicide (PAS)? In your answer describe how the two terms differ. (Minimum of 2 paragraphs including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)
A managed care group may want to market their organization as being “the best” or “a leader” in providing certain services/ treatment. How can this type or marketing effect quality of care and utilization of services, hence costs? (Minimum of 2 paragraphs including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)

According to Darr, MCO enrollees can be described as either light/moderate users or heavy users. What are some of the strategies that management uses to turn “heavy” users into light/ moderate users? In your personal opinion, what positives or negatives may result? (Minimum of 2 paragraphs including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)
Describe the constraints/challenges that physicians experience as being service providers affiliated with a Managed Care Organization. (Minimum 2 paragraphs including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)
Give a very brief “real-life” example/instance where drugs/ medical treatment/services were microallocated. And give a “real-life” example of macroallocation. (Do not include the examples provided in the text.) (Minimum 1 paragraph including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)
Read the case of Karen Ann Quinlan (p. 248-249). Explain why this is a case involving medical futility. (Include in your an answer the definition of medical futility). Darr (2011, p. 218) writes, “[the] futility theory has quantitative and qualitative aspects.” What is meant by these terms? Present arguments for each as it relates to this case. (Minimum 2 paragraphs including in-text citations and references in proper APA format)
Reference:
Darr, K. (2011). Ethics in Health Services
Management. (Fifth Edition).
Baltimore, MD: Health
Professions Press, Inc.
Having just completed this class, what do you now know that you did not know before?1-2 paragraphs
Please use times new roman font 12pt and APA in text citations and references

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Writer’s Choice

Objective: To critically replicate you’re thoughtful of the readings and your competence to rub on them to your Health care ethics.
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):
Students will judgmentally appraise the readings from Chapter 9 on your textbook. This assignment is intended to help you assessment, examination, and spread over the readings to your healthcare ethics as well as become the foundation for all of your remaining assignments.
You need to read the article (in the additional weekly reading resources localize in the Syllabus and also in the Lectures link) assigned for week 1 and develop a 2-3-page paper reflecting your appreciative and ability to apply the readings to your ethics. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA format 7th Edition, when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page.
EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. Introduction (25%) Provide a short-lived summary of the undertone (not a descriiption) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words.
2. Your Critique (50%)
*What is your response to the content of Chapter 9?
*What did you absorb about Ethics and Safe patient handling? Mention and explain two examples where you can apply them.
* What are the ethics arguments for advocacy on SPHM programs and behaviors?
*For the Professional role you have right now: what are the implications of this chapter for you?
3. Conclusion (15%)
Fleetingly recapitulate your thoughts & postulation to your analysis of the articles and Chapter you read. How did these articles and Chapters impact your thoughts about the principles of ethics?
Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:
a) The clarity with which you critique the articles;
b) The depth, scope, and association of your paper; and,
c) Your conclusions, including a descriiption of the impact of these articles and Chapters on any Health Care Setting.
Originality: SafeAssign submission required
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS
Assignments Guidelines 1.0 Points 10%
Introduction 2.5 Points 25%
Your Critique 5.0 Points 50%
Conclusion 1.5 Points 15%
Total 10 points 100%

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

abortion part 2 of assignment topic chosen from week three

I have attached the part one of the assignment you completed.
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapters 9, 10
Lesson
Minimum of 5 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)
Title: The Elements of Moral Philosophy
Authors: James Rachels, Stuart Rachels
Publisher: Mcgraw-Hill Education
Publication Date: 2018-03-20
Edition: 9th
APA Citation
Rachels, S., & Rachels, J. (2019). The elements of moral philosophy (9th ed.). Mcgraw-Hill Education.
Instructions
First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Include the following:
Publication details
Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)
Each annotation section should include the following:
Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.
Use the following as a model:
APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.
Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

For this report, you must research a topic in the Engineering field that you are

For this report, you must research a topic in the Engineering field that you are pursuing or interested in pursuing and address potential ethical issues that could be prevalent for this particular topic.
<
<
You have two options for submitting the report: I ALREADY CHOOSE OPTION 2.
<
<
Option 1 (10% Extra Credit on the Report grade): You will utilize LaTeX to generate the document in the IEEE Journal format. The capabilities of LaTeX are discussed here Links to an external site.. A respectable LaTex IEEE template can be found here Links to an external site.
<
<
The guidelines for the report: Guidelines for Contemporary Issue Report.docx
<
<
An example report: Sample Contemporary Report.pdfActions
<
<
Here Download Here Preview the document is a PDF helping to walk you through utilizing the ShareLaTeX capability to generate your report. Additionally, here Download here is a ZIP file that is referenced in the PDF.
<
<
Additionally to add the cover page to your IEEE document, on your IEEE template:
<
<
usepackage{pdfpages} with the other usepackages
<

<
includepdf[pages=-]{filename} after the begin document statement
<

<
Make sure that the Cover Page PDF is in the same directory as your other files.
<
<
OPTION 2: Submit as an MS Word document. There are plenty of IEEE templates online to follow.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

please take some reference for CodeOfEthics here, thank you so much. https:

please take some reference for CodeOfEthics here, thank you so much.
<
https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/NSPECodeofEthicsforEngineers.pdf
<
<
When addressing the case study, the analysis must include the following:
<
Define the stakeholders in the scenario.
<
– A stakeholder is anyone with a vested interest in the outcome of the issue at hand or anyone/party that had an obligation to act in the scenario.
<
– This is purely a definition, do not repeat what is already stated in the case study
<
<
Using concepts you have learned in class, evaluate the actions of the participants from an ethical standpoint.
<
– This will be the bulk of your analysis.
<
– You may also reference appropriate engineering codes of ethics, previous cases, peers, and personal/professional experience when analyzing the actions.
<
-Ensure you reference the relevant course concepts in your analysis
<
<
Provide at least two alternative courses of action to the problem. These alternatives do not have to necessarily be better courses of action—simply describe a different way the problem could have been addressed.
<
– Discuss the ethical implications of each alternative course of action.
<
– Identify any FUTURE actions which should be taken to prevent something like this from happening again.
<
<
This is an analysis paper; please ensure you properly reference the course concepts when they are used in your paper.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

What do you make of Rawls’ two principles? Do you think they really would resul

What do you make of Rawls’ two principles?
Do you think they really would result in a just society were they to be properly followed?
Do you think Rawls has improved on Hobbes, or is Hobbes still superior?
What sorts of objections can you rise against Rawls?

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount